Actuarial data management
Pulls policy, claims, and asset data from source systems.
Validates and reconciles records against finance totals.
Flags anomalies and missing fields with AI.
Converts data into each model's required format.
Most insurers already own a capable projection engine. The time goes elsewhere. Actuaries clean policy extracts, update assumption tables by hand, rerun models after late data, and rebuild change analyses in spreadsheets. Each step adds risk and slows the close.
Svitla builds actuarial software that handles everything around the engine. It manages data, assumptions, runs, and results in one governed environment. Your models keep doing the math, and your actuaries get time back to understand what the numbers mean.
You need fast rating models, clean experience data, and a way to test price changes before they reach the market.
You run triangles and projections every quarter. You need consistent data, method comparison, and a clear audit trail behind each selection.
You produce IFRS 17 or LDTI results under tight deadlines. You need controlled runs, reconciliations, and movement analysis that finance can trust.
Actuarial tooling is often a patchwork. In an Oliver Wyman survey of over 40 life insurers published by the SOA, most participants used more than one software package just to model assets. Every handoff between tools adds manual work.
We follow data from admin systems to final results, and note every handoff, spreadsheet, and manual check.
Your projection engine and approved methods stay. We decide together which steps to automate first.
We define access, approvals, version control, and audit trails that meet your model risk and audit requirements.
The new process runs beside your current close. Results are reconciled to the decimal before switchover.
Your team takes over daily use. We add new products, methods, and reports as your needs grow.
Below, Svitla shares a sample feature set that forms the core of an actuarial solution. Each real-life use case is unique, so you should elaborate on the functionality and tailor it to your lines of business, models, and reporting bases.
Pulls policy, claims, and asset data from source systems.
Validates and reconciles records against finance totals.
Flags anomalies and missing fields with AI.
Converts data into each model's required format.
Stores mortality, lapse, expense, and economic tables in one place.
Tracks versions, owners, and approvals.
Links each table to the runs that used it.
Alerts actuaries when experience drifts from assumptions.
Schedules runs and dependencies across engines.
Scales compute for stochastic and nested runs.
Reruns only the parts affected by a change.
Logs inputs, settings, and outputs for every run.
Analyzes mortality, lapse, and claims experience by segment.
Uses ML to surface new risk drivers for actuaries to review.
Compares actual with expected over time.
Produces credibility-weighted results.
Runs analysis of change step by step.
Drafts commentary on the main drivers with AI.
Feeds IFRS 17, LDTI, and Solvency II reporting.
Reconciles results with general ledger entries.
Keeps an inventory of models, owners, and validations.
Controls access and changes by role.
Records every approval and override.
Exports evidence packs for audits.
Answer a few simple questions to find out whether you should choose a custom solution or a pre-built actuarial platform.
Does your team spend more time preparing data than analyzing results?
Do you keep assumption tables in spreadsheets or shared folders?
Do you use more than one projection engine or modeling tool?
Have you tried a vendor's add-on that didn't fit your existing models?
Does your quarter-end close regularly run late?
Would AI-based experience studies or movement commentary help your team?
Do you plan to add new products, entities, or reporting bases soon?
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
Below, Svitla outlines the ROI factors an actuarial solution typically affects. Results depend on your lines, models, and starting point, so model them in your own process.
Automated data preparation.
Parallel and incremental runs.
Movement analysis ready on day one.
Controlled assumptions and versions.
Automatic reconciliations.
Fewer late restatements.
More scenarios tested per cycle.
Earlier warning on assumption drift.
Clearer insight for pricing and capital.
Full audit trail for every run.
Model inventory and validation records.
Shorter audit cycles.
Actuarial software touches reported results, capital, and regulatory filings. A small error can change a reserve by millions. The build must respect approved methods, strict controls, and engines actuaries have trusted for years.
We document the full cycle, from source data to signed-off results, including every control and sign-off. This shows where automation saves the most time without weakening controls.
We design one actuarial data model for policies, claims, assets, and assumptions. Pipelines validate and reconcile data on every load.
We build the assumption repository, approval workflow, and run orchestration. We test engine connectors against current outputs.
We add experience studies, drift alerts, and commentary on movement. Every AI output is reviewed by actuaries and documented for model governance.
The new process runs beside the old one for at least one full reporting cycle. Differences are traced and resolved before cutover.
We train each team, retire manual steps, and add products, entities, or reporting bases in planned releases.
A focused tool for a small insurer, MGA, or consulting firm typically costs $150,000 to $300,000. Examples include an experience study platform or an assumption-and-run manager for one line. An enterprise actuarial platform with data pipelines, governance, cloud compute, and reporting feeds typically costs $350,000 to $800,000. The final cost depends on lines of business, engines, and reporting bases.
Want to understand the cost of your actuarial software?
Calculate the costAnswer a few questions about your actuarial team and goals. We’ll prepare a tailored cost estimate for your project.
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
What our clients say about us
Learn how we overhauled a secure client portal for a solar energy company, modernizing its technology stack, implementing a fresh UI/UX, migrating to Microsoft Azure, and introducing a new billing system, thereby enhancing user satisfaction and streamlining operational efficiency.
Explore our approach to providing comprehensive cloud support for a US technology company’s supply chain management platform. Through meticulous AWS infrastructure management and Kubernetes deployments, we enhanced operational efficiency, security, and scalability.
Discover how we enhanced InvoiceASAP, a mobile invoicing network, by developing new features, increasing app accuracy, and improving reporting and visualization. With a dedicated development and QA team, we expanded capabilities, improved stability, and enhanced user experience.
With 23 years of experience in engineering financial software and practical knowledge of 10+ industries, Svitla offers full-cycle consulting and engineering services to deliver effective actuarial solutions.
We review your actuarial cycle, tools, and controls, then define what to automate and in what order.
We build data, assumption, run, and results tools around your engines and methods.
We audit your spreadsheet tools and legacy models and plan the migration. The new environment adds version control and automated runs the old setup lacked. We cut over after a parallel run and validate every result.
We build and maintain the pipelines that feed policy, claims, asset, and market data into your models.
No. Most clients keep their engines for the core calculations. We build the data, assumption, run, and reporting layers around them, so actuaries stop doing manual handoffs.
Methods stay in your models or in code your actuaries approve. Every change goes through review, and we compare results with the previous version before release.
AI supports actuaries but doesn’t replace their judgment. It flags anomalies, suggests risk drivers, and drafts commentary. Actuaries review and sign off on everything that reaches reports.
The software prepares inputs, controls runs, and produces movement analysis and reconciliations. It feeds your existing subledger or accounting engine with consistent, traceable data.
Pipelines process whatever is ready and flag what’s missing. When late data arrives, we repeat only the affected runs. You see exactly which results changed.
The software keeps a model inventory, validation records, and change logs. Access and approvals follow your model risk policy, and you can export evidence for auditors.
Yes. Many clients start with one line or one process, such as experience studies. The data model is built to add more lines and functions later.