Real-time transaction monitoring
Scoring of card, wire, ACH, and real-time payments as they happen, with risk decisions returned in milliseconds.
Fraud detection sits at the intersection of customer experience and financial crime risk, so we treat detection accuracy and false-positive rates as equally important architecture decisions. Fraud losses in the US rose by roughly a quarter last year alone, and UK institutions recorded over three million cases in a single year, which is exactly why static rule sets can’t keep up on their own. Every system we build logs every score, decision, and override in a complete audit trail from day one.
Before writing code, we map your transaction flows, existing rules engines, and case management processes, so data quality issues and regulatory reporting requirements surface at the start, not mid-project.
You need real fraud protection without the enterprise price tag or headcount a Tier 1 bank has. We build focused detection sized to your transaction volume and team, without the cost of consortium-scale infrastructure you won’t fully use.
You’re accountable for the false-positive rate your analysts drown in as much as the fraud that slips through. We build explainable scoring that cuts noise without cutting detection.
You need every decision defensible to an examiner, not just accurate. We build a complete audit trail into every score, alert, and override from day one.
Fraud doesn’t happen at one point in the customer relationship; it happens at three distinct surfaces, each with its own detection problem. Most institutions overinvest in one and leave the others exposed.
Before any code gets written, we look at where fraud actually gets through today- transaction-time, onboarding, or application-time- and where your current tools leave the biggest gap.
We build explainable models that show the reasoning behind every flag, improving investigation speed alongside detection accuracy.
Our engineers build the solution in tracked, reviewed cycles. At every stage, we validate detection accuracy and false-positive rates against real historical fraud data. You get regular progress updates, so nothing surfaces as a surprise.
Below, Svitla shares a sample feature set that forms the core of a fraud detection solution. Each real-life use case is unique, so you should elaborate on the functionality and tailor it to your transaction volume, fraud surfaces, and regulatory environment.
Scoring of card, wire, ACH, and real-time payments as they happen, with risk decisions returned in milliseconds.
Adaptive models that learn from transaction history and evolving fraud typologies, rather than static rule thresholds alone.
Analysis of typing patterns, navigation behavior, and device fingerprinting to flag account takeover and bot activity.
Alert triage, investigator workflows, and a full audit trail for every decision and override.
Sanctions, PEP, and adverse media screening integrated into the same transaction flow.
Shared fraud signals across institutions to catch mule accounts and known bad actors faster. The value compounds with scale: a pattern invisible in your own transaction history alone often becomes obvious the moment it's checked against a shared network.
Automated preparation of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and other filings required by regulators.
Real-time fraud loss, false-positive rate, and analyst productivity metrics exportable to your BI tools.
A risk score without a reason attached slows down investigators and erodes trust in the system. We build models that surface the specific factors behind every flag, so an analyst can act on a decision in seconds instead of re-investigating it from scratch.
Identity graph analysis and document verification that catch synthetic identities and falsified applications before an account opens or a loan funds, not after money has already moved.
Answer a few simple questions to find out whether you should choose a custom solution or a pre-built fraud detection platform.
Do you process a high volume of transactions across multiple channels (cards, wire, ACH, real-time payments)?
Is your current system generating a false-positive rate that’s overwhelming your fraud analysts?
Does your team still spend significant time on manual case review or rule tuning?
Do you need the system to integrate with a specific core banking platform, card processor, or payment rail?
Have you experienced new fraud typologies (e.g., authorized push payment scams, synthetic identities) that your current rules don’t catch?
Do you operate under regulatory requirements such as AML, BSA, or SAR filing obligations?
Do you need AI-based capabilities such as behavioral biometrics, network analysis, or adaptive risk scoring?
Have you already tried an off-the-shelf fraud platform that didn’t cover your workflows?
Do you plan to keep scaling transaction volumes over the next 2–3 years?
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
In Svitla’s projects, we consistently aim to address the key factors that drive maximum value and cost-effectiveness in fraud detection software:
Machine learning-based scoring adapts to real behavior and cuts noise. Institutions that move from static rules to model-assisted scoring commonly report alert volume reductions in the 30 to 50% range within the first six months, freeing analysts to focus on cases that actually matter.
Explainable scoring means an analyst can act on a flag in seconds instead of reconstructing the reasoning behind it manually.
Coverage at transaction-time, onboarding, and application-time catches fraud that a single-surface tool would miss entirely.
A complete, defensible audit trail reduces the cost and risk of a finding during a regulatory examination.
Consortium intelligence catches a pattern invisible in your own data alone, often before it becomes a repeated loss.
Machine learning-based scoring adapts to real behavior and cuts noise. Institutions that move from static rules to model-assisted scoring commonly report alert volume reductions in the 30 to 50% range within the first six months, freeing analysts to focus on cases that actually matter.
Developing fraud detection software means building a system that has to work across three distinct fraud surfaces at once: transaction, onboarding, and application, since covering only one leaves the others exposed. At Svitla, we work through four phases.
We analyze where fraud actually gets through today across transaction, onboarding, and application-time surfaces, then define the feature set, scoring model, and technology stack tailored to your transaction volume and regulatory environment.
Our engineers build the solution in short, reviewed cycles. We verify detection accuracy and false-positive rates against your real historical fraud and transaction data, not synthetic test cases.
We connect the system to your core banking, card processing, payment rails, and identity verification systems, testing each integration against live data before go-live.
We train fraud and compliance staff on the new workflows before rollout. After launch, we offer ongoing technical support and implement enhancements as fraud typologies and regulatory requirements evolve.
Based on Svitla’s experience, average costs for building custom fraud detection software range from $50,000 to $400,000, depending on solution complexity, the number of integrations, and the AI functionality involved.
Want to understand the cost of your fraud detection solution?
Calculate the costPlease answer a few quick questions about the fraud detection solution you’re looking to build. This will help our experts better understand your needs and calculate a tailored quote much faster.
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
What Our Clients Say About Us
Real feedback from teams who worked with us on detection accuracy, false-positive reduction, and compliance documentation challenges like these.
A closer look at real projects where explainable scoring, identity fraud detection, or regulatory reporting were part of the challenge, not just the pitch.
Discover how we enhanced InvoiceASAP, a mobile invoicing network, by developing new features, increasing app accuracy, and improving reporting and visualization. With a dedicated development and QA team, we expanded capabilities, improved stability, and enhanced user experience.
Discover how we significantly advanced a collaborative banking fintech solution, fostering integration between fintech and banks. Enhancements included improved web and mobile app performance, UX/UI redesign, and utilizing a microservices architecture and cloud services for scalability and optimal platform operation.
Uncover the ways we streamlined the testing process for a global tech leader's payment terminal software, introducing an automated framework and BDD-style tests that accelerated testing, enhanced quality, and reduced costs, enabling more efficient testing under various conditions.
With 17 years of experience in engineering financial software and practical knowledge of 10+ industries, Svitla offers full-cycle consulting and engineering services to deliver effective fraud detection solutions.
Fraud and AML process needs analysis.
Audit of the existing fraud detection workflows and tools (if any).
Recommendations on optimal features, architecture, and tech stack.
A plan of integrations with your core banking, card, and payment systems.
Implementation cost and time estimates, expected ROI calculation.
Fraud detection solution conceptualization and architecture design.
Custom development of the fraud detection system.
Integration with the necessary financial systems.
Quality assurance and model validation.
Continuous support, model retraining, and evolution (if required).
A risk number tells an analyst something is wrong; an explanation tells them what and why, which is the difference between a five-minute investigation and a thirty-minute one. We build models that surface the specific factors, not just the score.
Yes, if we build in identity graph analysis and document verification as part of the solution, so a synthetic identity or falsified application gets flagged before an account opens, not months later.
We build adaptive scoring that learns from real behavior and outcomes over time, and institutions moving from static rules commonly see alert volume drop 30 to 50% without missing the fraud that actually matters.
It’s built into the architecture from day one, every score, decision, and override logged and traceable, so a regulatory exam is a quick lookup rather than a reconstruction project.
Off-the-shelf platforms work well when your transaction volume and fraud patterns are fairly standard. Custom development pays off when your specific fraud surfaces, false-positive tolerance, or integration needs don’t fit a packaged platform’s assumptions.
Yes, and fraud typologies shift constantly, so we offer post-launch support that covers monitoring, model retraining, and enhancement as new fraud patterns emerge.