Real-time shipment tracking
A single, normalized view of shipment location and status across carriers, modes, and regions.
Automatic reconciliation when two data sources report slightly different statuses for the same shipment.
A visibility platform earns trust only if its tracking data and ETA predictions hold up across every carrier and mode involved, not just the ones that report cleanly. We treat data-ingestion breadth and prediction accuracy as core architectural decisions, not a map overlay layered on top of existing systems.
Before any code gets written, we map your existing carrier, TMS, and ERP data sources, so integration complexity and data latency requirements surface at the start.
You need to know where a shipment is without opening five different carrier portals to find out. We build one normalized view across every carrier and mode you work with.
You’re accountable for whether a delay gets caught in time to act on it, not after it’s already affected a delivery commitment. We build proactive alerting that flags exceptions as they emerge.
You’re the one answering “where is my order” without a reliable answer to give. We build shareable, branded tracking views so customers get the same accurate status your team sees internally.
A shipment doesn’t disappear when a carrier stops reporting cleanly, it just becomes invisible to you until someone asks where it is. Here’s where that blind spot usually starts.
Before any code gets written, we look at every carrier, mode, and data source you rely on, and exactly where tracking data breaks down or goes stale between systems.
Every carrier reports differently, so we build the ingestion and normalization logic around your specific mix of carriers and modes, not a generic template that assumes uniform data.
Development happens in short, reviewed cycles, and every cycle gets checked against real historical shipment and carrier performance data, so ETA predictions and exception alerts are trustworthy before launch, not just plausible.
Below, Svitla shares a sample feature set that forms the core of a supply chain visibility solution. Each real-life use case is unique, so the functionality should be elaborated on and tailored to your business specifics.
A single, normalized view of shipment location and status across carriers, modes, and regions.
Automatic reconciliation when two data sources report slightly different statuses for the same shipment.
AI-supported arrival predictions that factor in live traffic, weather, and historical carrier performance.
Confidence indicators on each ETA, so teams know when a prediction is solid versus a rough estimate.
Automated flags for delays, temperature excursions, or route deviations as they happen.
Alert routing based on severity, so a minor delay doesn't get the same urgency as a compliance-critical breach.
Ingestion and normalization of tracking data from ocean, air, rail, and road carriers.
Automatic handling of a new carrier's data format without custom development for every addition.
Support for sensor data covering location, temperature, and condition monitoring in transit.
Historical condition logs that support claims and compliance documentation after the fact.
Shareable, branded tracking pages that reduce “where is my order” inquiries.
Configurable detail levels, so customers see relevant status without exposing internal logistics data.
Carrier and lane performance reporting to support future sourcing and routing decisions.
Trend views that catch a carrier's gradually declining performance before it becomes a pattern.
Direct connections to TMS, WMS, ERP, and SCM systems so visibility data feeds into existing workflows.
Two-way sync, so execution decisions made downstream also reflect back into the visibility layer.
Answer a few simple questions and find out whether you should opt for a custom solution or a pre-built visibility platform.
Does your team check multiple carrier portals to find the status of a single shipment?
Are your ETAs often inaccurate or based on static distance calculations?
Do you usually find out about a delay only after a customer asks about it?
Do you need the system to integrate with a specific TMS, WMS, ERP, or SCM platform?
Have you evaluated AI-based ETA prediction or exception detection tools?
Do you need to track shipment condition data, such as temperature, in transit?
Do you want customers to be able to track their own shipments directly?
Do you expect your carrier network or shipment volume to grow over the next 2–3 years?
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
In Svitla’s projects, we consistently aim to address the key factors that drive maximum value and cost-effectiveness in supply chain visibility software:
Customer-facing tracking reduces the manual workload on customer service teams.
Self-service tracking answers the question before a customer picks up the phone to ask it.
Proactive alerts give teams more time to act before a delay affects downstream operations.
Severity-based routing means the most urgent exceptions reach the right team first.
Reliable ETAs improve the quality of downstream scheduling and inventory decisions.
Confidence-scored predictions let planners weigh a forecast instead of treating every ETA as certain.
Historical performance data supports better carrier selection and negotiation.
A documented performance trend carries more weight in a renewal conversation than an anecdote.
Condition monitoring for sensitive shipments catches issues before they become costly losses.
A documented condition history speeds up claims resolution when a loss does occur.
Automated, normalized tracking reduces time spent checking multiple carrier portals.
One shared view removes the duplicated checking that happens when teams don't trust each other's data.
Developing supply chain visibility software is a multifaceted process that includes business analysis, solution architecture and design, development, testing, integration, and comprehensive user training. At Svitla, the implementation of visibility systems follows these key stages:
We start by analyzing your carrier mix, tracking objectives, and current visibility gaps, gathering detailed requirements that reflect where your teams lose track of a shipment today. From there, we define the optimal feature set, data ingestion approach, and technology stack tailored to your carriers and shipment types, so the architecture handles your real data variety rather than an idealized single format.
We translate those findings into a concrete plan covering project scope, deliverables, timeline, budget, and team structure. This happens before development starts, so logistics, operations, and customer service stakeholders share the same expectations about what launches first.
Our engineers build the visibility solution iteratively, delivering working functionality in short, reviewed cycles so you see tracking and normalization working against real carrier data early. Alongside development, we verify functionality, security, and performance, with particular attention to tracking data accuracy, ETA prediction, and alerting logic, since a wrong ETA is worse than no ETA at all.
We migrate relevant historical shipment and carrier performance data from legacy systems, validating accuracy at every step so historical analytics aren’t built on flawed data. At the same time, we connect the new system to your carriers, TMS, WMS, ERP, and SCM systems, testing each integration against live data before go-live.
We train logistics, operations, and customer service staff on the new workflows before rollout, so the transition doesn’t create a gap in coverage. After the system goes live, we offer ongoing technical support to ensure stability and performance, and implement enhancements as your carrier network and business requirements evolve.
Based on Svitla’s experience, average costs for building a supply chain planning solution vary from $80,000–$600,000, depending on the solution complexity.
Want to understand the cost of your supply chain planning solution?
Calculate the costPlease answer a few quick questions about the supply chain visibility solution you’re looking to build. This will help our experts better understand your needs and calculate a tailored quote much faster.
Thank you! We will be in touch soon.
What our clients say about us
Real feedback from teams who worked with us on tracking accuracy, carrier integration, and exception management challenges like these.
A closer look at real projects where multi-carrier data, ETA accuracy, or exception alerting were part of the challenge, not just the pitch.
Examine how we enhanced a fleet management mobile app with new features and improved user experience, ensuring functionality synchronization and stability across iOS and Android platforms, leading to a faster development cycle and more capable and stable applications.
Find out how we updated the backend for a fleet management tracking device, enhancing data collection and management capabilities, and automating processes to support a large number of devices in real-time, resulting in reduced infrastructure costs and improved scalability.
Uncover how we modernized a leading fuel management platform, transitioning from a monolithic to a microservices architecture, developing cross-platform mobile applications, and enhancing security features, significantly improving system reliability and user experience.
With 17 years of experience in engineering logistics and supply chain software and practical knowledge of 10+ industries, Svitla offers full-cycle consulting and engineering services to deliver effective visibility solutions.
Carrier mix and data source needs analysis.
Audit of the existing tracking and exception management workflows (if any).
Recommendations on optimal feature set, data ingestion approach, and tech stack.
A plan of integrations with your TMS, WMS, ERP, and SCM systems.
Implementation cost and time estimates, expected ROI calculation.
Visibility solution conceptualization and architecture design.
Custom development of tracking, ETA prediction, and exception alerting functionality.
Integration with the necessary carrier, TMS, WMS, ERP, and SCM systems.
Quality assurance and security testing.
Continuous support and evolution (if required).
Audit of your current tracking process, carrier portals, or legacy visibility platform.
A phased cutover that keeps active shipment tracking running during the transition.
Expanded carrier and mode coverage the old system couldn't support.
Post-migration validation against your prior ETA accuracy and exception response records.
A migration plan for historical shipment and carrier performance data.
Supply chain management software is a broader planning-and-execution suite, with network visibility as one of several features (alongside inventory, orders, and supplier collaboration). Supply chain visibility software is a dedicated, real-time tracking and monitoring layer focused on shipment-level location data, predictive ETAs, and exception alerts across carriers and modes, and it typically integrates with SCM, TMS, WMS, and ERP systems rather than replacing them. If you’re not sure which one fits your need, tell us your process, and we’ll help you scope it.
Yes. We build predictive ETA models that combine live traffic, weather, and historical carrier performance data, and we validate their accuracy against actual arrival times so the models improve over time.
Yes. Integration with your carriers, TMS, WMS, ERP, and SCM systems is planned in the first project phase. We work with commonly used systems and carrier APIs, and build custom connectors where standard ones don’t exist.
Off-the-shelf platforms work well when your carrier mix is fairly standard and your tracking needs stop at “where is it now.” The moment you need condition monitoring for sensitive cargo, alerting logic tuned to your specific severity thresholds, or integration with a system a packaged platform doesn’t support out of the box, you’re working around someone else’s defaults instead of building around your actual operation. Custom development pays off when those specifics are the rule, not the exception. If a pre-built platform genuinely covers what you need, we’ll say so directly and can help you implement it instead.
It depends on how many carriers and modes the system needs to ingest from day one, and how much historical data needs to be reconciled during migration. A visibility layer covering a handful of core carriers moves faster than one spanning ocean, air, rail, and road with IoT condition monitoring layered on top. Rather than one large release, we typically deliver in phases: tracking for your primary carriers first, so you see real value and real data quality issues surface early, before we expand to additional carriers, predictive ETAs, or customer-facing views.
Yes, and visibility software in particular tends to need adjustment as your carrier network changes, not just when something breaks. A new carrier joins your network with its own data quirks, or an existing one changes its reporting format without warning, and the normalization logic needs updating to keep pace. We offer post-launch support and enhancement engagements that cover monitoring, maintenance, and the ongoing tuning of ingestion logic, ETA models, and alerting rules as your carrier network and business requirements evolve.